20 Comments
founding

So excited for you! One immediate thought we can riff about longer. It seems like the general answer regardless of codification (the Ur as you mention) is that a great essay is subjective and objective. Which I think applies to big concepts like beauty and taste. We don't have the Aristotle of essays, but we do have what Aristotle has written about beauty, for instance.

Something worth thinking about.

Expand full comment

“I’d rather alchemize minds than automate words.” Hell yea! I can attest to your profound questions in draft 1 to elevate draft 2. Very cool to see this all in writing. :)

Expand full comment

This is amazing news, Michael (and I love what you’ve done with the place). This feels like the moment the character answers the call to adventure, or maybe the moment he returns from the underworld... You’re already doing great work, and I’m glad you’ll have the means to do even more of it. Congratulations!

P.S. Please score Joan Didion’s “In Bed” from The White Album.

Expand full comment

Please consider "U Unibus Pluram" by David Foster Wallace. I think it's the best essay ever written.

Expand full comment

Brilliant piece, Michael !! Very much looking forward to all that you'll be posting here. The first year and a half as one of your Substack subscribers has been truly great. Congratulations on your fellowship grant. Very proud of your accomplishments, and I anticipate learning even more from you the next year and a half than I have this first year and a half.

Expand full comment

Major congrats Michael!!

This sentence made me go whoa: It’s not about automating your process, but guiding you on a life-long one. I’d rather alchemize minds than automate words.

Expand full comment
Jul 16Liked by Michael Dean

Congrats!! Can't wait to see what's coming!!

Expand full comment

Congrats, Michael! So stoked for you and everyone who will benefit from this.

Really fascinating what you’re doing and love the opening line of your application. What a hook!

Look forward to following your journey. :)

Expand full comment
Jul 16·edited Jul 16Liked by Michael Dean

Congrats, Michael! I’m so psyched for you. And so glad this is not just off the ground but full-on soaring. I’m building my syllabus for next year now, and considering some of the essays you’ve listed above in order to share your reading and scoring with my students. Thanks for sharing some of the architecture of your brain with us here. (We’re all benefitting from it.)

Expand full comment

Wow well done Michael!

Expand full comment

Congratulations and well deserved! This is going to change how writing is taught in schools and I couldn’t be more excited as an educator! 🎉🙌

Expand full comment
founding

Congrats! This is so well deserved. Can't wait to see what comes next. :)

Expand full comment
Jul 16Liked by Michael Dean

A perfect new name!

Expand full comment
Jul 16Liked by Michael Dean

Hey! I just found out about you relatively recently. I’m very interested in your quest for a unified theory of the essay.

These 27 patterns and this textbook.. do you have some index somewhere that answers the following questions:

- how close to done with the textbook are you?

- given a pattern (or general topic), where is all the associated content you’ve written about that pattern?

- That one tweet thread you did on all the different types of repetition was amazing. Do you have a list of tweet threads you’ve made like that?

Expand full comment
author

Hey Joshua! Were you in Foster (at the time, Compound) back in 2020? I think we may have met once before. I've completed the first of nine sections (Thesis) here on Substack, and aim to put out a section per month from now, meaning I'll be finished by early 2025.

On X, you should see a "Highlights" tab that has a bunch of my threads and writing visuals. It's funny to think that those 17 types of repetition were all within 1 of the 27 patterns. I'm finding each pattern has a whole dictionary of "types" within it.

Expand full comment
Jul 16Liked by Michael Dean

HEY!!! I sure was!!

Got it got it!

And ooh fantastic! I forgot about that X feature. thanks!!

YEAH holy crap there are so many freaking taxonomies within the taxonomies

I love nerding out about what granularities each one captures that the other doesn’t, is this term from this taxonomy The Same Thing as this other term from this other taxonomy.. etc

Expand full comment

...first off mega congrats...so stoked to see you build this beast (bot)...shuddering at how i will be treated by said bot, but man must improve (said at gunpoint from a robot firing range)...

What’s a key feature you’re looking for in an AI-powered craft companion? Maximum Deanitude

What’s a pattern you’re starting to notice across everything you read? Too much authority. More and more of everyone is sure of themself and sharing said certaintude. Give me the seek so I can hide.

Expand full comment

Congrats on the grant! I am very interested in this scoring plug-in you're creating (and the textbook—will certainly be buying a physical copy).

I've always been fascinated by George Orwell's essays. "Why I Write" could be an interesting one to score.

Expand full comment